The situations in street racing that have resulted in injuries/death are nearly identical to those in this incident. My reference to street racing was an example of similar situations that should have raised the awareness of the local authorities to the need for additional protection of the spectators. That being said, I'm sure they didn't draw the same correlation.I think the points you make are certainly valid, but are not really applicable to the situation. This was an exhibition of hotrods and race cars. Not an illegal street race.
Additionally, what are your thoughts on my point regarding the numerous other exhibitors that performed burnouts with the same potentially fatal results? Any of us that have been around drag racing for any length of time have seen less powerful cars have disasterous results when a burnout went wrong.
Sounds like a good basis for a negligence charge against the locals to me.I doubt that any police chief, mayor, city manager, etc etc. would have ever authorized such display if they knew, with reasonable expectation, that such a tragedy was remotely possible. It defies logic for sure!
I am purely speculating here, but I doubt that anyone with any form of common sense and in a position of authority would have given Mr. Critchley the "green light" to smoke'em all the way down Main Street. JMO of course.
I work in an environment that is extremely safety consceince. If I were to ever presume some level of safety without analyzing all potential hazards I would lose my job in a heartbeat and possibly face charges if an accident resulted in injury or death.
Don't get me wrong. I'm an not arguing that Mr. Critchley doesn't bare any responsibility. My contention is that if you're going to charge one person, you need to charge everyone involved.