I think it's important to remember that not only was Tony new to the booth as an analyst, but the entire broadcast (and broadcast team) was shooting their first race. Sure, many of them worked together at ESPN, but I'm sure they developed a relationship and chemistry with ESPN. Now they're all learning to work with a new group and new procedures. I think they'll all find their groove within a few races. One recommendation I would make to Tony would be to work harder at some of the technical explanations. Over time Mike Dunn was really good at taking something TF or PS related and explaining it so the average layman could understand it. (Yes, I said "over time" so I don't expect Tony to have it all figured out tomorrow - it's just constructive criticism & advice.)
I've always believed covering an NHRA event live is a tough nut to crack. We've all been to the races and we know there's tons of downtime between rounds on Sunday... especially the later rounds, which is what they want to cover. So I ask... why aren't they covering the sportsman stuff? At least cover Top Alcohol Dragster and Funny Car. There's just too much filler and even us hard-core fans get bored watching and hearing the same old thing race after race. For example - they filled three or four minutes during the live broadcast with a recap of 2015. That's great for the first race of the year, but what are they gonna do at the next race with those three or four minutes?
Bottom line: I commend the effort and I appreciate the desire to liven up the broadcast, but dead time is dead time no matter how you slice it.