machine the axle hubs and the wheel hubs so they interlock, the studs then do the clamping and not the driving.![]()
what he said
machine the axle hubs and the wheel hubs so they interlock, the studs then do the clamping and not the driving.![]()
Change the bolt circle diameter. Add a stud. Problem solved.
It may work for a longer period of time, but can you tell me how many teams if any, if ever, change out studs for purposes of averting failures ? I believe that most teams only changed studs if the threads became damaged. We racers are always guessing at the life of Aluminum rods, Ti valves, etc. How about wheel studs, wheels themselves, what might be the throwaway criteria ?
Change the bolt circle diameter. Add a stud. Problem solved.
Isn't that what Steve Pluegar stated RG???
Sorry, Randy but, adding more rotating weight, weaking the wheel center does not sound like the best option.Change the bolt circle diameter. Add a stud. Problem solved.
OK, let me stop the bull**** right now...the lugnuts WERE torqued and a Torquewrench WAS used....not a Snap On, but a Matco, Those studs break, and they break for a particular reason, and it has to do with corrosion at the first thread exposed. Has happened before, will happen again unless replaced on a regular service interval basis, or until the design is changed.
Please DO NOT make it sound so F'n simple that somebody didnt torque the wheels. Thats not the case....
How would adding bolts to it in a larger circle weaken the wheel center? I would think the wheel would be stronger.Sorry, Randy but, adding more rotating weight, weaking the wheel center does not sound like the best option.
How would adding bolts to it in a larger circle weaken the wheel center? I would think the wheel would be stronger.
So, how many times have wheels actually come off of TF/FC's in the last 5-10 years? Out of all the passes made? The point being that any system can fail. It might be better to just replace wheel studs at a more frequent interval.
To answer an earlier post... if increasing the bolt spacing (diameter) and adding a stud or two will weaken the assembly why aren't all the 80,000# GVW 18 wheeler's running a 5X5.5" pattern?
Simple stuff.
RG
I suppose adding additional hole(s) for more studs could theoretically weaken the wheel - I certainly don't know. However, if true, this just illustrates how complicated this issue is. I don't think you can remove material from existing wheels and hubs to create an interlocking system. If this is going to work, all existing wheels and hubs will have to be redesigned and replaced (also applies to a larger bolt circle and/or more studs). As Randy said, very "spendy".
Started this thread because I think it's good that people are working on an issue we all agree needs to be solved. Tethers or restraints could certainly make things worse for the driver - a wheel and tire thrashing around in a funny car body next to the driver is a frightening thought. Is this risk worth it to protect spectators? I'm glad I don't have to make that decision.
I hope teams will be much more diligent in drive line maintenance and mounting until a solution is found . . . the sport doesn't need another disaster. JMHO
I just got this e-mail from a friend of mine and wanted to pass this along.
"My engineer colleague stated that their research showed an increase in the tensile stress in the bolt by a factor of more than FIVE as a result of lubricating the threads with light oil compared to clean dry threads, using the same tightening torque in both cases. Of course, any given case will be different, depending on the lubricant used, the thread pitch, and so on."