Rear End Carnage,, and questions (8 Viewers)

fueller42

Nitro Member
Hey, just to preface this, I want to say, I'm not an engineer, metallurgist or any kind of physicist. I'm just an old dude that's built, modified, repaired, designed and imagineered a bunch of s...tuff.
I have no doubt that there are more than a couple people elbows deep in trying to figure out what's going on with the RWR rear ends (and those others that have grenaded in the past).
I have seen more than one image showing the pinion housing basically destroyed. My question is, which pinion bearing is taking the transverse load, ie: the push or pull of the pinion shaft. Is the bevel gear pushing the pinion outward, or pulling it inward? I know the couplers are designed with a small amount of play in them, so I don't imagine they have anything to do with it (binding etc.), and my mind keeps coming back to the pinion being pushed out by the bevel gear, or, more accurately, the pinion forcing itself away from the bevel gear.

Am I completely out to lunch??
 
The theory is that pinion teeth are breaking off and then getting lodged in between the pinion and ring gear, thus blowing the pinion out of the front of the housing.
 
The theory is that pinion teeth are breaking off and then getting lodged in between the pinion and ring gear, thus blowing the pinion out of the front of the housing.
For the last 10 years, I've been working with salvage farm equipment (40,000 + part numbers). A bunch of the stuff we sell is bevel and pinion sets. We take cores in. Part of my job is to disassemble the cores, and determine what is good, what is junk. I've seen hundreds of front 4wd axles come in, and the same for rear diff housings/assemblies, and, from what I can recall, pieces either trashed the inner bearing, broke bevel teeth, or just ended up in the bottom of the pumpkin. That being said, the rpm is significantly different, and I can imagine the centripetal force on the "chunks" could very well be slinging them back into bevel gear, effectively forcing the inner end of the pinion sideways, putting a HUGE side/torque load on the inner bearing, breaking the snout there??
Obviously, I don't know, I'm just spit-ballin'. It also seems odd to me that it seems to be happening after the first couple seconds of the run, not at the hit. I know lock up is a huge change in torque applied, so, there's that?
I would LOVE to see any results/conclusions to what the ultimate issue is..never too old to learn something.
 
The load is MUCH bigger out at a 1.8-2.4 seconds, when the engine comes out of retard and the clutch starts to apply. That's where everything breaks. If you remember when wheel studs used to break that was always at that same spot.

Alan
 
The load is MUCH bigger out at a 1.8-2.4 seconds, when the engine comes out of retard and the clutch starts to apply. That's where everything breaks. If you remember when wheel studs used to break that was always at that same spot.

Alan
I wondered about that Alan. I would be interested to know, has Chrisman or Strange ever done any kind of testing, comparing the face load on the gear tooth, or optimal helix, shock load at the hit vs. max torque load? Have there been any changes in geometry, or are the gears just the same as they've always been,(excluding physical size) just because it worked OK in the past?
 
Alan is correct. My first thought was when the clutch "hits" its a shock that cannot always be absorbed. As a tool and die maker I remember cutter sharpening, gear/cutter hobbers and other critical machining. Its strenuous work. The pinion is enduring some amazing workloads. Wiping across the ring gear with insane pressure. If the pinion moves away from the ring gear even a few thousands its over. Christman builds a great rearend and they will solve this. Gears are a science all of their own. Aircraft gear in Chicago destroyed many good machinists. I feel for those in the stands.
 
Hey Jim, saw on the news that the Feds had a "false positive" on the lettuce, apologized to the lettuce companies. Now the lettuce guys have to absorb the cost of the recalls. arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim
In the late seventies, cars started using more recycled steel and when we started restoring them in the nineties we had to deal with the rust and contamination during welding or painting. Is it possible the metal just isn't as good as used to be? I mean on a molecular level.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top