Adam
Nitro Member
Wow! I wonder why it took so long for them to find out?
Isn't SFI the company that NHRA contracts to approve safety gear? If Impact can no longer participate after this is over than bye-bye to the sport of NHRA drag racing for impact. That's a lot of money down the drain.
I can't believe Bill would be involved in something like this. Wonder if he is still running the show.
Can Randy or someone summarize this whole Bill Simpson saga for me? I remember that he left his own company when he became a target after DE Sr. got killed, and then started Impact, was he really trying to cut corners with this new company without concern for safety?
The chain of events speaks for itself.
He sold the company with a clause not to compete for 5 years. 5 years went by and he went back into business. Somewhere during this process some very bad decisions were made.
This counterfeit SFI label decision, the Hans device counterfeit posts decision and the decision to release fire suits and safety equipment that did not comply with the SFI spec labels sewn into the equipment makes me think someone cares more about making a buck than the racers who buy from them.
Glad to see SFI is on top of this. The time to find out is before disaster strikes.
RG
Allot of folks have big money the suits and helmets. I heard that the helmet are not hit on this deal, is that correct?
What was the question with SFI and its responsibilties a couple of years back-T/F chassis cert. i think?
On Friday, September 21st Top Fuel team owner Bill Miller presented a three-page document to the PRO Top Fuel and Funny Car Committee and NHRA officials, including Graham Light and Dan Olson, a document dated August 27th and addressed to the PRO membership.
Accompanying the letter was a supporting document from Dr. Rory R. Davis, PE, of Convergence Engineering Corporation of Gardnerville, Nevada. Miller’s letter, broken down into four sections, outlined the current chassis situation regarding SFI and NHRA. It went on to a similar outline of Funny Car chassis specs, then offered some general points. The letter ended with a conclusions and recommendations section.
The gist of Miller’s missive was that the use of heat treated tubing in Top Fuel and Funny Car chassis had not been made with any scientific supporting documentation, and that there had been a significant number of chassis failures as a result of its use. He cited incidents involving both Tony Schumacher and Cory McClenathan, but for different reasons. According to Miller, in his opinion, the Schumacher problem was the result of the use of too small tubing, mandated by the SFI chassis spec at that time, while the McClenathan problem was the result of the Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) failing from welding hardened or heat treated tubing in that area of the car.
Again according to Miller’s letter, “There is no provision for the use of hardened tubing in the present SFI Funny Car Spec. Without explanation the Funny Car Spec mandates normalized (not hardened) tubing…” Miller continues, “McKinney has admitted using hardened tubing in Funny Car chassis. Funny Car chassis failures, like Top Fuel, have increased since the use of hardened tubing.”
On April 9, 2006 Miller sent a letter to Arnie Kuhns of SFI. In it he writes, “Keeping in mind that McKinney has told JFR that the bottom frame rails of their chassis are not normalized SAE 4130 tubing as mandated by SFI 10.1E, please answer the following question: How did these JFR racecars get technical approval?”
Kuhns did not respond, and in Miller’s words, “hasn’t responded to anything I’ve said or written in the last two years.”