That was an awesome couple sessions... Dave Roemer & Harold Hartin both run 6.165 & don't get in... Thats brutal!!
Given how good the Pro Mod field was at Budds Creek, it's a shame they screwed it up with the final that Stott and D'Aprile ran.
Jim
With all due respect I disagree. They were in a no win situation. Even if Stott beat him someone would have said Tommy laid down for him. I say it was great for the the sponsors. 40 seconds of track / TV time for tow great guys.
Discloser: I'm biased and do PR for the guys.
What a bias!
Here's how I see it:
Fans paid money to see a race. What they saw was two cars idle down the track for 40 seconds for a pre-arranged outcome.
If Stott had beaten Tommy, yes, some people might have said he laid down for Stott. Instead, they overtly showed that the race was fixed.
By fixing the race as they did, they cheated the fans and they cheated the other drivers in the points race. How was fixing that race fair to Danny Rowe? How was Stott even fair to himself knowing that he had to fix the race to gain the points he did?
If you don't race to win every time, don't bother. If I were running things at IHRA, I'd have told both of them to not bother attending Rockingham. By allowing it to happen, IHRA has shown itself to be a sanctioning body that allows racers to fix races.
Jim
I'm a big fan of IHRA and the Pro Mods but this is a black eye for both, especially after the stellar performance shown by that class this weekend. Ashley didn't lie down for Capps last weekend and Rowe shouldn't have for Stott either.
What a bias!
If Quain ran a 6.05 and Tommy ran a 6.09 in the finals - would you be happier - I think not.
So, in your mind he has to win the championship by 20 or more points?If they did it legitimately, I would be happier. And Stott could say he earned the points lead, which he cannot do right now.
Jim
D'Aprile was fifth, if he'd won he'd still be fifth. Stott was 30 points out of the points lead, Why risk an oildown, which could have made him come up five points short of the lead.Why play games - it was a business decision and they made no bones about it. This ain't week one, it's week 10 of 11 and not to have team orders in that situation is just plain stupid.
Jim - up until this point I thought we were having a conversation. To accuse someone of cheating by working together - well, I just think you're a bit goofy now.In any other sport, if you throw a game, it's called cheating.
As to risking an oildown, that's part of racing. If he wasn't racing a teammate, he would have had to risk the oildown and earn the victory.
Bottom line: they fixed the race and Stott did not earn the victory.
Jim