If it was John's car then you charge his team 1 of the 4. If Robert was driving it then he also gets charged 1 of his 4. Pretty simple to me. And why should a clarification have been needed? It was perfectly understandable to anybody with a basic grasp of the English language what "This policy applies to both the team and driver" means. This is nothing but favoritism towards team Force by NHRA, just like NHRA does for the Harley's.But please, answer my question. If John had meetings and they had Robert drive in testing would you charge Robert's team with the day, or John's?
Alan
But please, answer my question. If John had meetings and they had Robert drive in testing would you charge Robert's team with the day, or John's
I believe that if you were in the position that one of your teams needed to test and their driver wasn't able to be there you would be allowed to have another of your drivers fill in. At that point the test would be charged to the team, not the fill-in driver.
Is it really that clear? Or does it actually read as I stated earlier, the rule applies to the TEAM AND (that team's) DRIVER? Because if it's interpreted by the latter, Robert is that team's driver.If it was John's car then you charge his team 1 of the 4. If Robert was driving it then he also gets charged 1 of his 4. Pretty simple to me. And why should a clarification have been needed? It was perfectly understandable to anybody with a basic grasp of the English language what "This policy applies to both the team and driver" means. ..........................
NHRA Story » Force, Hight swapping seats for next two eventsCould someone point out where it was stated that they are changing cars and teams, I must have missed that part. All I saw was that Robert was testing John's car. If indeed they are switching cars then Robert should not have been allowed to test, as this would be his fifth test day with "his team".
Unfortunately, I think Graham should have recognized the cause and effect of the affirmative answer to John's question, and responded, no.
A fair and prudent business person would apologize to Force for making a horrible decision to the detriment of the greater whole, after explaining his error to the remaining competitors while allowing them all to come up with a solution that is fair (i.e. uncomfortable to all).
My suggestion is Hight continues only eligible for 50% of his Reading points and then officially revise the rule to current.
At the end of the season Graham should resign at the request of the association.
I want to be clear on the pictures that I posted in post number 38 of this thread.
The pictures are NOT posted in the correct order in which they were taken. The first 2 pictures were actually from the 3rd pass of the day. The 3rd picture was from the 2nd pass.... I did not watch the 1st pass from the starting line but I did see it from my room balcony. However, a good friend, Chris Anderson, who also has posted in this thread WAS on the starting line for the first pass and watched Robert climb into the car. I have no idea why John was wearing his fire suit (maybe he was cold) but I know for a fact John did not drive a car on Monday morning. Rumor around the track was..... they planned to run until 4pm, I left at 2:30 after the 3rd pass. If John ran a car it would have been after I left...... and about 4 hours since he was last spotted wearing his fire suit.