Re: Funny car driver Melanie Troxel said she hopes the shorter course isn't permanent
Damn it Bob, you owe me a monitor!
Rex needs some Viagra!
Damn it Bob, you owe me a monitor!
Rex needs some Viagra!
Rex,
I know you were there, and so that completely disqualifies anyone else who has an opinion that doesn't agree with you, but give your attitude a rest, bro.
The heart behind what Drew was saying is that 320' would not have a made a difference if the car blew up at 1000'. Many cars have blown up at 1000-1100' before and drivers have been totally fine.
This was brakes, parachutes, sandtrap, camera boom, and a concrete wall that all contributed to the terrible tragedy that has changed all of our lives.
The point that I have been making all along is that people will find a way to make these things faster with time. Drag racing is a science. Who can find the right combination to make things the fastest. If we stay at 1000' for five years, cars will blow up at 900 or 990'. And we will be back to the same issue.
If Scott's car would have exploded as he crossed the "new" finish line at 1000' (I know you said 1100', but just pretend and don't get your panties in a wad just yet...), would the extra 320' of stopping space have saved his life?
I seriously have my doubts.
Drew, I am with you bro!
Waiting for the "I was there and you weren't, so you don't freaking know what you're talking about" statement,
Jeremy
So does this mean your not going to trash those drivers opposed to 1000' racing like you did me and others? Come on Erection, your losin it!
Rex,
I wasn't questioning anything regarding the safety issues. I was merely questioning the reasoning or the use of the argument in this particular case. The extra 320' in Scott's crash wouldn't have made any difference at all from what I saw but it's just my opinion based on just that.
The sandtrap/boom/wall/poles etc...all could have been another 320' down the track and I don't see how that would have changed anything. If there's proof otherwise please someone explain it.
That all being said, I fully understand the desire to slow them down or do something to eliminate the dangers and I was in no way questioning that. For the record...I'm neither for nor against 1000' racing. I agree that aside from the E.T.'s flashed up on the board that most won't really notice that much of a difference.
Jeremy, thanks for the support.
And, not to you Drew, if any one would like to trade my experience at E-Town that day???????? You can have it. Think it was fun, that it's a easy thing to get outta' your head??
I'm "agin" it! But I am willing to see what pans out this weekend and the next few races. Safety of the drivers is the most important thing. If I don't like the product on the track, I can stay home. I just wish they would slow the cars down to about 280 mph and let the 1320' stand.
Then Ashley Force is in trouble!
She gets left on quite frequently.
You said it, not me!
We all knew it was coming...
If you change the Marathon in the Olympics to 22 miles , than its not a Marathon , its just a foot race. This weekend we will not see a Drag Race, just a 1000 ft run.
Dennis,I 've run two marathons. Why didn't I think of that analogy.If you change the Marathon in the Olympics to 22 miles , than its not a Marathon , its just a foot race. This weekend we will not see a Drag Race, just a 1000 ft run.
Dennis,I 've run two marathons. Why didn't I think of that analogy.
Good one .
JOHN FORCE stated today that he's prepared to race to 1000ft FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE!!!
DENNIS...YOU better tell 'em he aint DRAG racing ANYMORE!!!!!!
advise us maters of the results of your conversation.
John also said he was trying to chase down his opponent and found himself running past the shutoff point. He is only for this as a safety measure. After Eric, safety is # 1. God forbid someone gets hurt again, going 300 plus at 1000ft. Slow them down. Drop compression, as stated by Brad A. to around 275 or so, take off the extra weight, and go back to 1320. Saves lives , saves parts , saves Nitro.