Only because we the policyholders guarantee that insurance companies are profitable does it make an sense whatsoever .... clearly the insurance company sells wrecked cars through companies like Copart every minute of every business hour. A flood damaged car is not fundamentally worse than a totaled wrecked car. You just don't want the entire car to be restored because of the long term effects on electronics of flood water and the likelihood that it will be sold well above its actual FMV.... once pulled from the water many of the other parts are very usable/restorable.
"They had to build the freeway because the cars were illegal to drive on the street" ..... hmmm, let's think about that for a second. There must be some geniuses doing the whole Street Outlaw filming, because they are very often driving cars that are not street legal outside of the various laws applicable to the street otherwise. Maybe they had to build the set because it takes a while to film stuff and freeways are a little expensive to rent out when they are otherwise being used by the tax paying public. I respect your right to have an opinion, but I'm afraid that I'm not very impressed with the underlying fundamentals of your opinion.
"They had to build the freeway because the cars were illegal to drive on the street" ..... hmmm, let's think about that for a second. There must be some geniuses doing the whole Street Outlaw filming, because they are very often driving cars that are not street legal outside of the various laws applicable to the street otherwise. Maybe they had to build the set because it takes a while to film stuff and freeways are a little expensive to rent out when they are otherwise being used by the tax paying public. I respect your right to have an opinion, but I'm afraid that I'm not very impressed with the underlying fundamentals of your opinion.
