I`m just thankful it wasnt one of them Summit cars involved...this thread would be 75 pages long alreadyIt sure looked like he won to me.
Look at the slo-mo at the finish line. Sure looks like his car crossed the line first.
At the very least it looked like a "dead heat."
It certainly didn't look like the the five inch margin of victory that was announced.
In professional horse racing they use timing equipment, but they also (still) use a frozen image (freeze frame) of the noses to verify the victory as they cross the finish line. The camera images of AJ/EE differed greatly from the announced margin of victory.
For what its worth, if you do the math-
Erica ran 205.26mph
205.26 mph X 0.001sec (margin) X 5280 ft/mi x 1hr/60min X 1min/60sec X 12in/ft = 3.62 inches.
Pretty darn close. You can't tell who won visually - Im sure the camera wasn't precisely on the finish line, so theres some skew there. Plus try to see 3.6 inches from 30 yards away... its near impossible.
That run makes the who got the light award at the next race on jumbotron.
W) Erica Enders (ZaZa Energy Cobalt) 0.014 6.697 205.26
(L) Allen Johnson (Mopar/J & J Racing Avenger) 0.020 6.692 205.41
The numbers don't lie...AJ would have needed to run a 6.690 to overcome her starting line advantage.
All you "numbers don't lie" people need to remember that it's just a computer -- garbage in, garbage out. All the "numbers" you quote come from the same computer system. That's like saying a ruler can't be wrong because it's a ruler. If it was made wrong, it's wrong.
Again, I'm not saying there's a conspiracy, but all you people who are blindly accepting the computer-generated numbers are forgetting that computers make mistakes. All the time. Trust me, 25 years in the computer business, it could be wrong.
I'm not advocating that anything be done, I'm not advocating that she didn't win. I'm just laughing at all the "the numbers prove it" people, when the numbers all come from the same system that declared the winner. It is within the realm of possibility that the system was wrong.
Like ...
Hey Paul,
must have just been the camera angle that gave Mike the win....
Alan