Near extinction?Alan, Tony S, Kyle : If you were speaking for PRO or even if you ran NHRA: care to throw out any ideas that would lessen the explosions, lower the cost for teams , and improve the show for fans of the nitro cars ? It appears to a lot of us that they are headed towards near extinction at 340 mph with no chutes.
You may have exaggerated, LOL, but it's certainly true that NHRA needs to address the issues plaguing the fuel classes.Sorry, there will always be those that find a way to run a fueler, I should not exaggerate. But we do seem to be losing more teams than we are gaining. Everyone here loves this sport and we want it to continue for many years, if something can be done to lessen the costs, hopefully those changes will be implemented soon.
Well we will see now that Darryl Cutler is involved. I believe you're gonna see some nice payouts.I'm the Drag boat world, TFH has basically priced it's self out of business. Cost of running versus payback is comparable to $0.
A wise man recently told me if you back off the glue, the tuners wouldn’t be able to throw everything at the parts limit, parts would last longer, lower funded teams would be more competitive, yes it would take a little time for them to get used to, slowly bring down the stick to a point over time, how far to take it needs be found by NHRA and PRO, just my thoughts from things I’ve heardAlan, Tony S, Kyle : If you were speaking for PRO or even if you ran NHRA: care to throw out any ideas that would lessen the explosions, lower the cost for teams , and improve the show for fans of the nitro cars ? It appears to a lot of us that they are headed towards near extinction at 340 mph with no chutes.
I thought they tried that a few years ago.A wise man recently told me if you back off the glue, the tuners wouldn’t be able to throw everything at the parts limit, parts would last longer, lower funded teams would be more competitive, yes it would take a little time for them to get used to, slowly bring down the stick to a point over time, how far to take it needs be found by NHRA and PRO, just my thoughts from things I’ve heard
I remember that too, I think it should be revisited now more than ever, put the tuner in play with the driver and take away the advantage of the money teams that can throw complete new motors in every roundI thought they tried that a few years ago.
A wise man recently told me if you back off the glue, the tuners wouldn’t be able to throw everything at the parts limit, parts would last longer, lower funded teams would be more competitive, yes it would take a little time for them to get used to, slowly bring down the stick to a point over time, how far to take it needs be found by NHRA and PRO, just my thoughts from things I’ve heard
I thought they tried that a few years ago.
IMO cutting the size of the fields is NOT the way to grow participation. And remember, while we've had some short fields in TF this year, we've gone through periods like this before, decades ago in fact.I know that people are going to roast me for this, but what would happen if NHRA went to 8-car fields for Top Fuel and Funny Car. Two qualifying rounds on Saturday, three elimination rounds on Sunday.
My thoughts are if you cannot throw all the horsepower you can make at super glued tracks, when the cars lose traction that the motors will better handle damage if there not on razers edge of parts limits, sure you are going to have all the same tire smoking when set up is missed, that’s where the crew chief and driver comes in, that to me is where not having the money to have a 100 % fresh motor every round will help lower funded teams be competitive when you can’t use all the power, the motors will live longer in all situationsIt seems to me that most of the big explosions are not cars stuck to the track, they are cars starting to spin that drop a cylinder (or more) and hydraulic the motor. Making the track less sticky previously just led to more tire spin and dropped cylinders.![]()