It could have had just the opposite effect. When I worked at Ford HQ years ago Ford was a VERY conservative company. They were protective of the family image they projected. MANY companies are concerned about the image they and their representatives project. They want no part of controversy even if it draws attention. Some will follow this post and say it isn't so. Don't believe. Not all companies are like Go Daddy. Some still have conservative values and want no part of their representative posing nude.
I think she could have found something more favoring a family oriented sport .
I don't think it's a negative [ guys no doubt are drooling ] but Drag Racing is still the largest Grassroots Motorsports and has a large family participation ratio .
No doubt she will be alright it's just not the image Women in Drag Racing need .
You can look pretty scantily clothed .
I understand the Body thing was the object of the shoot but what does it have to do with Drag Racing ?
And who wants to see Scelzi do something like that .
It could set the sport back 50 years !
I think I hear the sound of a deceased equine being walloped.
Her magazine cover is just the ticket to show how popular her image would be for a future sponsor.
the Connie Kalitta/Ed McCullough charm school
What kind of stories will come from this era? "Remember the time I got a latte instead of a mocha in the airport after Epping?"
What kind of stories will come from this era? "Remember the time I got a latte instead of a mocha in the airport after Epping?"
I have not seen the photos...she made a decision to do something and could careless about the critics.
You need to see the photos and video before commenting.
She might care if the "critics" are the folks in the board room.
Marketing toys to kids (radio control stuff) by someone not concerned about being a good role model to kids will likely bite you in the bare a$$ some day.